Auto Recall Watch
U.S. public vehicle records

Dutchman 1203 recalls by model year

Explore the records behind recurring owner reports.

Key facts

5 owner complaints analyzed

0 distinct recall campaigns

Not available median reported failure mileage

Scope: 1995 to 1995 model years. Data updated: . 0 complaints include usable failure mileage. View data status.

This selection has limited data. It remains available for lookup but is excluded from search indexing.

Compare model years

Recalls by model year

All campaigns in the snapshot affecting each model year, including recalls announced years later.

Recall campaigns

Shared campaigns appear once in each affected model year.

1995
0
Recall campaigns data
CategoryCount
19950

1995: 0

Year-by-year records

Dutchman 1203 model-year comparison
Model yearComplaintsRecallsChange in recalls
199550Not available

Recall history

0 distinct campaigns affect this selection. Announcement dates below are different from vehicle model years. A campaign may cover multiple years.

No recall campaigns are recorded in this snapshot.

Explore the data

Vehicle analysis explorer

Inspect model-year patterns, reported mileage, monthly activity and the evidence behind each signal.

Data completeness

5 unique complaints in this selection. Analysis snapshot: 2026-10-01.

0.0%Usable mileage0 / 5 records
100.0%Valid incident date5 / 5 records
100.0%Valid filing date5 / 5 records
100.0%Ordered incident and filing dates5 / 5 records

Missing, zero and invalid mileage is excluded. Dates after the snapshot are excluded. Examples are limited selections, not a representative sample.

Problems by model year

Model-wide comparison of the eight most reported components across the model. Cells show counts and shares within each model year. Open a cell for source examples.

Component complaint heatmap
Component1995
Unknown Or Other
240.0%
ODI 10025581

RE: ODI # 10025422 (DEFECT WITH DUTCHMEN LIFT SYSTEM CABLE). ON 7/07/03, MY WIFE CONTACTED DUTCHMEN CORP IN ELKHART, IN REGARDING THE FAILURE OF THE CABLE. DUTCHMEN CUSTOMER SERVICE INFORMED HER THAT THE CABLE FAILURE WAS NOT THIER CONCERN/ INFORMED MY WIFE THAT DAMAGED CABLE AND DAMAGE BY CABLE SNAPPING WAS NOT COVERED BY DUTCHMEN. MY WIFE CONTACTED CUSTOMER SERVICE AT RV AMERICA, THE SERVICE REP (WHO HAS NEVER LOOKED AT MY DUTCHMEN) STATED THE REASON THE CABLE HAD SNAPPED WAS BECAUSE OF LACK OF MATIENCE. REP TOLD HER THAT THE CABL…

Look up ODI 10025581 at NHTSA ↗

Equipment
120.0%
ODI 8013969

POP UP TRAILOR WAS FULLY CRANKED UP WHEN IT COLLAPSED, CAUSING THE CABLE TO BREAK.*AK *JB

Look up ODI 8013969 at NHTSA ↗

Power Train:Axle Assembly
120.0%
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

Structure:Body
120.0%
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

Structure:Body:Hatchback/Liftgate
120.0%
ODI 10025422

CABLE FOR LIFT SYSTEM ON DUTCHMEN CAMPER SNAPPED WHILE RAISING CAMPER. CAP WEIGHS 500 POUNDS & WAS 4 FEET IN THE AIR WHEN CABLE SNAPPED. THIS IS A SAFTEY ISSUE, AS YOUR HANDS HAVE TO BE UNDER CAP WHILE IT IS BEING RAISED/LOWERED TO TUCK IN/PULL OUT FABRIC OF CAMPER...AND ALSO WHY INSTALLING COVERS FOR SUPPORT BRACKETS. IN OTHER WORDS, IF THE CABLE SNAPS YOU HAVE 500 POUNDS OF CAP COMING DOWN ON YOUR HANDS...WHICH COULD BE SEVERED BECAUSE THERE IS A METAL ON THE CAP AND THE CAMPER EDGE WHERE THE CAP AND CAMPER BODY MEET. CAP CAME DOWN SO H…

Look up ODI 10025422 at NHTSA ↗

Tires
120.0%
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

Darker cells indicate a larger share of submitted complaints. Components overlap. This measures complaint composition, not failure probability.

Failure mileage by component

Median and middle 50% of usable owner-reported mileages. Ranges require at least five records.

Component failure mileage distribution
ComponentMileage range (25th–75th percentile)MedianUsable recordsExamples
No usable records for this analysis.

Complaint and recall timeline

Explore monthly filing activity alongside recall announcements. Up to ten years of monthly history is available.

1 reports2024-112026-10

Solid line: filed complaints. Dashed amber lines: recall announcement dates for this vehicle selection; markers include all recall components. The latest month is partial. Temporal proximity does not establish causation.

Monthly counts, recall campaigns and complaint examples
Monthly complaint and recall timeline
MonthComplaintsCampaigns announcedExamples
2024-110None

No examples available for this selection.

2024-120None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-010None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-020None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-030None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-040None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-050None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-060None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-070None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-080None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-090None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-100None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-110None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-120None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-010None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-020None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-030None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-040None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-050None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-060None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-070None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-080None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-090None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-10 (partial)0None

No examples available for this selection.

Emerging complaint spikes

Complete months in the latest six months with at least 10 complaints, at least twice the preceding 12-month average, and at least three square-root deviations above that average.

This is a descriptive screening rule, not a statistical defect finding. Publicity and reporting changes can increase submissions.

No complete months meet the spike thresholds for this selection.

Equal-age model-year comparison

Model-wide cumulative reports during the first three or five calendar years, starting with the model year (age 0). Only fully elapsed windows are compared.

Age 0Age 1Age 21 reports

1995: 1 complaints

Equal observation windows
Model yearThrough age 0Through age 1Through age 2
1995001
Date coverage across each selected cohort
Date basis for all complaints in selected model years
YearIncident dates usedFiling date fallbacksExcluded dates
1995500

Incident date is preferred when valid and no later than filing; otherwise filing date is used. Model year approximates age. Equal observation time does not adjust for sales, distance driven or reporting delays. One complaint linked to multiple model years can appear in each cohort.

Components reported together

Each cell counts unique complaints naming both components. Open a nonzero cell for examples.

Component co-occurrence matrix
ComponentUnknown Or OtherEquipmentPower Train:Axle AssemblyStructure:BodyStructure:Body:Hatchback/LiftgateTires
Unknown Or Other—00000
Equipment0—0000
Power Train:Axle Assembly00—
1
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

0
1
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

Structure:Body00
1
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

—0
1
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

Structure:Body:Hatchback/Liftgate0000—0
Tires00
1
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

1
ODI 828466

REAR AXLE AND THE TIRES ARE NOT RATED HIGH ENOUGH TO SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE TRAILER. OWNER CONTINUES TO HAVE BLOW OUTS BECAUSE OF THIS. DEALER/MANUFACTURE ADMIT THAT THIS IS A DESIGN FLAW. *AK THE ORIGINAL ROOF ON THE TRAILER WAS NOT PROPERLY SEALED ON TOP WHICH ALLOWED MOISTER TO GATHER IN THE ROOF AND CREATE A ROOF THAT WAS FAR TO HEAVY FOR THE CABLE SYSTEM TO LIFT. *YH

Look up ODI 828466 at NHTSA ↗

0—

Co-reporting does not establish that one component caused another concern.

Recurring narrative patterns

Specific keyword mentions beyond broad component labels. Matching includes negations and comparisons and does not confirm a diagnosis.

0 patterns with matching reports.

No narratives match the published patterns.