Explore the records behind recurring owner reports.
Key facts
2 owner complaints analyzed
0 distinct recall campaigns
350 mi median reported failure mileage
Scope: 2014 to 2015 model years. Data updated: . 1 complaints include usable failure mileage. View data status.
This selection has limited data. It remains available for lookup but is excluded from search indexing.
Owner-reported patterns
Most common problems
Engine is the most frequently named component, appearing in 1 of 2 complaints (50.0%). A complaint can name multiple components.
Recurring terms in complaint narratives
Topic
Matching reports
Share of complaints
Engine operation
1
50.0%
Topic matches use published keyword rules. They describe mentions, including negations or comparisons, and do not confirm a diagnosis. Read the matching rules.
Component breakdown
Number of unique complaints naming each component. Top eight shown.
Engine
1
Structure:Body
1
Suspension
1
Unknown Or Other
1
Component breakdown data
Category
Count
Engine
1
Structure:Body
1
Suspension
1
Unknown Or Other
1
Engine: 1; Structure:Body: 1; Suspension: 1; Unknown Or Other: 1
Reported problems by failure mileage
Complaint counts in mileage bands. These are not failure rates per vehicle or mile.
Under 25,000
1
25,000 to 49,999
0
50,000 to 74,999
0
75,000 to 99,999
0
100,000 to 149,999
0
150,000 and above
0
Reported problems by failure mileage data
Category
Count
Under 25,000
1
25,000 to 49,999
0
50,000 to 74,999
0
75,000 to 99,999
0
100,000 to 149,999
0
150,000 and above
0
Under 25,000: 1; 25,000 to 49,999: 0; 50,000 to 74,999: 0; 75,000 to 99,999: 0; 100,000 to 149,999: 0; 150,000 and above: 0
Under 25,000 miles has the most reports with usable mileage (1). 1 complaints have missing, zero or invalid mileage.
Complaints over time
Year the complaint was filed, not the vehicle model year or incident year. The snapshot year is partial.
2016
1
2017
1
Complaints over time data
Category
Count
2016
1
2017
1
2016: 1; 2017: 1
Pattern summary
Engine leads the component reports. Engine operation appears in 1 complaint narratives. Use these patterns to inspect individual reports and prepare questions for a mechanic.
Calculated from recorded counts. An AI narrative has not been published for this selection.
Complaint evidence
Examples provide context, not a representative sample or a verified diagnosis.
Owner report 10883738 · 2016-07-09 (July 9, 2016)
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
Inspect model-year patterns, reported mileage, monthly activity and the evidence behind each signal.
Data completeness
2 unique complaints in this selection. Analysis snapshot: 2026-10-01.
50.0%Usable mileage1 / 2 records
100.0%Valid incident date2 / 2 records
100.0%Valid filing date2 / 2 records
100.0%Ordered incident and filing dates2 / 2 records
Missing, zero and invalid mileage is excluded. Dates after the snapshot are excluded. Examples are limited selections, not a representative sample.
Problems by model year
Model-wide comparison of the eight most reported components across the model. Cells show counts and shares within each model year. Open a cell for source examples.
Component complaint heatmap
Component
2014
2015
Engine
1100.0%ODI 10883738 · 350 mi
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2015 HONDA PIONEER 700-4 (NA) MOTORCYCLE. WHILE DRIVING 15 MPH, THE ROAD BAR COLLAPSED WITHOUT WARNING. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE ROAD CAGE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS NOT AVAILABLE.
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
Darker cells indicate a larger share of submitted complaints. Components overlap. This measures complaint composition, not failure probability.
Failure mileage by component
Median and middle 50% of usable owner-reported mileages. Ranges require at least five records.
Component failure mileage distribution
Component
Mileage range (25th–75th percentile)
Median
Usable records
Examples
Engine
Too few reports for a range
350 mi
1 (sparse)
ODI 10883738 · 350 mi
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
Explore monthly filing activity alongside recall announcements. Up to ten years of monthly history is available.
Solid line: filed complaints. Dashed amber lines: recall announcement dates for this vehicle selection; markers include all recall components. The latest month is partial. Temporal proximity does not establish causation.
Monthly counts, recall campaigns and complaint examples
Monthly complaint and recall timeline
Month
Complaints
Campaigns announced
Examples
2024-11
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2024-12
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-01
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-02
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-03
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-04
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-05
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-06
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-07
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-08
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-09
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-10
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-11
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2025-12
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-01
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-02
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-03
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-04
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-05
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-06
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-07
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-08
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-09
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
2026-10 (partial)
0
None
No examples available for this selection.
Emerging complaint spikes
Complete months in the latest six months with at least 10 complaints, at least twice the preceding 12-month average, and at least three square-root deviations above that average.
This is a descriptive screening rule, not a statistical defect finding. Publicity and reporting changes can increase submissions.
No complete months meet the spike thresholds for this selection.
Equal-age model-year comparison
Model-wide cumulative reports during the first three or five calendar years, starting with the model year (age 0). Only fully elapsed windows are compared.
2014: 1 complaints · 2015: 1 complaints
Equal observation windows
Model year
Through age 0
Through age 1
Through age 2
2014
0
1
1
2015
0
1
1
Date coverage across each selected cohort
Date basis for all complaints in selected model years
Year
Incident dates used
Filing date fallbacks
Excluded dates
2014
1
0
0
2015
1
0
0
Incident date is preferred when valid and no later than filing; otherwise filing date is used. Model year approximates age. Equal observation time does not adjust for sales, distance driven or reporting delays. One complaint linked to multiple model years can appear in each cohort.
Components reported together
Each cell counts unique complaints naming both components. Open a nonzero cell for examples.
Component co-occurrence matrix
Component
Engine
Structure:Body
Suspension
Unknown Or Other
Engine
—
0
1ODI 10883738 · 350 mi
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…
Co-reporting does not establish that one component caused another concern.
Recurring narrative patterns
Specific keyword mentions beyond broad component labels. Matching includes negations and comparisons and does not confirm a diagnosis.
1 patterns with matching reports.
Stalling or loss of power
1 mentions · 50.0% of complaints
Median mileage: 350 mi (1 usable records).
ODI 10883738 · 350 mi
THIS IS AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE PRESENTED BY BOTH THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER AS SUITABLE FOR HIGH ALTITUDE USE. AFTER PURCHASE NEW ON 5.1.2014 THE VEHICLE STALLED AND QUIT RUNNING AT 10,500 FOOT ALTITUDE. WHEN I ADVISED THE DEALER OF THIS PERFORMANCE CONCERN, I WAS ADVISED THAT THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT TESTED THIS VEHICLE AT HIGH ALTITUDES FOR SALE AND USE IN THE HIGHER COLORADO MOUNTAINS AND THAT THERE WERE NO REPAIRS FOR THE PROBLEM. WHEN I BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE HONDA CORPORATE OFFICE IN SAN JOSE, CA., BOTH BY PHONE AND IN WRITING…