Auto Recall Watch
U.S. public vehicle records

Drv MOBILE recalls by model year

Explore the records behind recurring owner reports.

Key facts

3 owner complaints analyzed

2 distinct recall campaigns

12,000 mi median reported failure mileage

Scope: 2005 to 2011 model years. Data updated: . 2 complaints include usable failure mileage. View data status.

Compare model years

Recalls by model year

All campaigns in the snapshot affecting each model year, including recalls announced years later.

Recall campaigns

Shared campaigns appear once in each affected model year.

2005
0
2008
1
2010
1
2011
2
Recall campaigns data
CategoryCount
20050
20081
20101
20112

2005: 0; 2008: 1; 2010: 1; 2011: 2

Year-by-year records

Drv MOBILE model-year comparison
Model yearComplaintsRecallsChange in recalls
200510Not available
200811Not available
201001Not available
201112+1

Recall history

2 distinct campaigns affect this selection. Announcement dates below are different from vehicle model years. A campaign may cover multiple years.

12V028000 · Wheels:Rim

Reported: 2012-01-30 (January 30, 2012) · Model years: 2008, 2010, 2011

DRV SUITES (DRV), FORMERLY DOUBLETREE RV, IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2008 AND 2010-2011 SELECT, MOBILE, AND ELITE SUITE RECREATIONAL VEHICLES MANUFACTURED FROM JUNE 12,2007, THROUGH OCTOBER 27,2010 AND EQUIPPED WITH DISC BRAKES. DUE TO THE PAINT APPLIED TO THE ALUMINUM WHEEL AND HUB FACE, THE WHEEL MAY BECOME LOOSE.

Consequence: THIS SITUATION CAN RESULT IN THE WHEEL/RIM MOVING, SHEARING OF THE WHEEL STUDS AND THE WHEEL COMING OFF OF VEHICLE, INCREASING THE RISK OF A CRASH.

Remedy: DRV WILL NOTIFY OWNERS, AND DEALERS WILL REMOVE THE PAINT FROM THE HUB FACE AND THE BACK OF THE WHEELS FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MARCH 5, 2012. OWNERS MAY CONTACT DRV AT 1-574-457-6472.

NHTSA campaign record ↗
11V236000 · Exterior Lighting:Headlights:High/Low Beam Dimmer Switch

Reported: 2011-04-14 (April 14, 2011) · Model years: 2011

DRV IS RECALLING CERTAIN MODEL YEAR 2011 SELECT, MOBILE AND ELITE SUITE 5TH WHEEL RECREATIONAL VEHICLES EQUIPPED WITH ITC 2 WIRE DIMMER SWITCHES. THE DIMMER CIRCUIT BOARD OVERHEATS DURING USE CAUSING THE CIRCUIT BOARD AND DIMMER HOUSING TO MELT AND DEFORM. AS THE DIMMER SWITCH FAILS, THE LIGHTS MAY BECOME INOPERABLE OR NOT WORK CORRECTLY AND THERE MAY BE A NOTICEABLE SMOKE OR BURNING SMELL.

Consequence: THE FAILURE OF THE DIMMER SWITCH WILL CAUSE THE LIGHTS TO STOP DIMMING AND/OR WORKING. AN OVERHEATED SWITCH CAN ALSO LEAD TO PERSONAL INJURY AND/OR FIRE.

Remedy: DEALERS WILL REPLACE THE DIMMER SWITCHES FREE OF CHARGE. THE SAFETY RECALL BEGAN ON MAY 3, 2011. OWNERS MAY CONTACT DRV AT 1-574-457-6472.

NHTSA campaign record ↗
Explore the data

Vehicle analysis explorer

Inspect model-year patterns, reported mileage, monthly activity and the evidence behind each signal.

Data completeness

3 unique complaints in this selection. Analysis snapshot: 2026-10-01.

66.7%Usable mileage2 / 3 records
100.0%Valid incident date3 / 3 records
100.0%Valid filing date3 / 3 records
100.0%Ordered incident and filing dates3 / 3 records

Missing, zero and invalid mileage is excluded. Dates after the snapshot are excluded. Examples are limited selections, not a representative sample.

Problems by model year

Model-wide comparison of the eight most reported components across the model. Cells show counts and shares within each model year. Open a cell for source examples.

Component complaint heatmap
Component2005200820102011
Structure:Frame And Members:Underbody Shields
1100.0%
ODI 10510858

WHILE REPLACING MY FIFTH WHEEL'S SHOCKS I FOUND ONE UPPER SHOCK MOUNT COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE FRAME. I TOOK THE UNIT TO A REPAIR FACILITY WHERE THE PROBLEM WAS REPAIRED AND THE TECHNICIAN FOUND ANOTHER UPPER MOUNT THAT HAD CRACKS EVIDENT THIS WAS ALSO REPAIRED. ALL UPPER SHOCK MOUNTS WERE FOUND TO BE DIMPLED ON THE TOP SIDE. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE THICKNESS OF THE FRAME MATERIAL DID NOT SEEM TO BE THICK ENOUGH. HIS SUGGESTED REPAIR WOULD BE TO CUT OUT THAT SECTION OF FRAME AND INSTALL THICKER MATERIAL. *TR

Look up ODI 10510858 at NHTSA ↗

00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

0Unavailable

No examples available for this selection.

00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

Suspension
1100.0%
ODI 10510858

WHILE REPLACING MY FIFTH WHEEL'S SHOCKS I FOUND ONE UPPER SHOCK MOUNT COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE FRAME. I TOOK THE UNIT TO A REPAIR FACILITY WHERE THE PROBLEM WAS REPAIRED AND THE TECHNICIAN FOUND ANOTHER UPPER MOUNT THAT HAD CRACKS EVIDENT THIS WAS ALSO REPAIRED. ALL UPPER SHOCK MOUNTS WERE FOUND TO BE DIMPLED ON THE TOP SIDE. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE THICKNESS OF THE FRAME MATERIAL DID NOT SEEM TO BE THICK ENOUGH. HIS SUGGESTED REPAIR WOULD BE TO CUT OUT THAT SECTION OF FRAME AND INSTALL THICKER MATERIAL. *TR

Look up ODI 10510858 at NHTSA ↗

00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

0Unavailable

No examples available for this selection.

00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

Unknown Or Other
00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

0Unavailable

No examples available for this selection.

1100.0%
ODI 10575787 · 5,000 mi

TL THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 DRV DOUBLETREE MOBILE SUITE DRV FIFTH WHEEL. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH HE WAS NOTIFIED BY ANOTHER DRIVER THAT THE LANDING GEAR LOWERED AND THE GEAR HAD EXTENDED DOWN TO THE PAVEMENT. THE LANDING GEAR WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HYDRAULIC LEVELING SYSTEM. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE FAILURE COULD HAVE POTENTIALLY CAUSED A MAJOR CRASH TO OCCUR. THE FAILURE WAS DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER WHO STATED THE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM CAUSED FLUID TO LEAK THROUGH AND LOWER THE LANDING GEAR…

Look up ODI 10575787 at NHTSA ↗

Wheels
00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

1100.0%
ODI 10680576 · 19,000 mi

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 DRV MOBILE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT 65 MPH, BOTH FRONT AND REAR DRIVER'S SIDE WHEELS FRACTURED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE WHEELS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 19,000.

Look up ODI 10680576 at NHTSA ↗

0Unavailable

No examples available for this selection.

00.0%

No examples available for this selection.

Darker cells indicate a larger share of submitted complaints. Components overlap. This measures complaint composition, not failure probability.

Failure mileage by component

Median and middle 50% of usable owner-reported mileages. Ranges require at least five records.

Component failure mileage distribution
ComponentMileage range (25th–75th percentile)MedianUsable recordsExamples
Unknown Or OtherToo few reports for a range5,000 mi1 (sparse)
ODI 10575787 · 5,000 mi

TL THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 DRV DOUBLETREE MOBILE SUITE DRV FIFTH WHEEL. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH HE WAS NOTIFIED BY ANOTHER DRIVER THAT THE LANDING GEAR LOWERED AND THE GEAR HAD EXTENDED DOWN TO THE PAVEMENT. THE LANDING GEAR WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HYDRAULIC LEVELING SYSTEM. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE FAILURE COULD HAVE POTENTIALLY CAUSED A MAJOR CRASH TO OCCUR. THE FAILURE WAS DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER WHO STATED THE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM CAUSED FLUID TO LEAK THROUGH AND LOWER THE LANDING GEAR…

Look up ODI 10575787 at NHTSA ↗

WheelsToo few reports for a range19,000 mi1 (sparse)
ODI 10680576 · 19,000 mi

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 DRV MOBILE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING AT 65 MPH, BOTH FRONT AND REAR DRIVER'S SIDE WHEELS FRACTURED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE WHEELS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 19,000.

Look up ODI 10680576 at NHTSA ↗

Complaint and recall timeline

Explore monthly filing activity alongside recall announcements. Up to ten years of monthly history is available.

1 reports2024-112026-10

Solid line: filed complaints. Dashed amber lines: recall announcement dates for this vehicle selection; markers include all recall components. The latest month is partial. Temporal proximity does not establish causation.

Monthly counts, recall campaigns and complaint examples
Monthly complaint and recall timeline
MonthComplaintsCampaigns announcedExamples
2024-110None

No examples available for this selection.

2024-120None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-010None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-020None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-030None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-040None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-050None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-060None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-070None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-080None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-090None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-100None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-110None

No examples available for this selection.

2025-120None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-010None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-020None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-030None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-040None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-050None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-060None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-070None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-080None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-090None

No examples available for this selection.

2026-10 (partial)0None

No examples available for this selection.

Emerging complaint spikes

Complete months in the latest six months with at least 10 complaints, at least twice the preceding 12-month average, and at least three square-root deviations above that average.

This is a descriptive screening rule, not a statistical defect finding. Publicity and reporting changes can increase submissions.

No complete months meet the spike thresholds for this selection.

Equal-age model-year comparison

Model-wide cumulative reports during the first three or five calendar years, starting with the model year (age 0). Only fully elapsed windows are compared.

Age 0Age 1Age 21 reports

2010: 0 complaints · 2011: 1 complaints

Equal observation windows
Model yearThrough age 0Through age 1Through age 2
2010000
2011001
Date coverage across each selected cohort
Date basis for all complaints in selected model years
YearIncident dates usedFiling date fallbacksExcluded dates
2010000
2011100

Incident date is preferred when valid and no later than filing; otherwise filing date is used. Model year approximates age. Equal observation time does not adjust for sales, distance driven or reporting delays. One complaint linked to multiple model years can appear in each cohort.

Components reported together

Each cell counts unique complaints naming both components. Open a nonzero cell for examples.

Component co-occurrence matrix
ComponentStructure:Frame And Members:Underbody ShieldsSuspensionUnknown Or OtherWheels
Structure:Frame And Members:Underbody Shields—
1
ODI 10510858

WHILE REPLACING MY FIFTH WHEEL'S SHOCKS I FOUND ONE UPPER SHOCK MOUNT COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE FRAME. I TOOK THE UNIT TO A REPAIR FACILITY WHERE THE PROBLEM WAS REPAIRED AND THE TECHNICIAN FOUND ANOTHER UPPER MOUNT THAT HAD CRACKS EVIDENT THIS WAS ALSO REPAIRED. ALL UPPER SHOCK MOUNTS WERE FOUND TO BE DIMPLED ON THE TOP SIDE. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE THICKNESS OF THE FRAME MATERIAL DID NOT SEEM TO BE THICK ENOUGH. HIS SUGGESTED REPAIR WOULD BE TO CUT OUT THAT SECTION OF FRAME AND INSTALL THICKER MATERIAL. *TR

Look up ODI 10510858 at NHTSA ↗

00
Suspension
1
ODI 10510858

WHILE REPLACING MY FIFTH WHEEL'S SHOCKS I FOUND ONE UPPER SHOCK MOUNT COMPLETELY SEPARATED FROM THE FRAME. I TOOK THE UNIT TO A REPAIR FACILITY WHERE THE PROBLEM WAS REPAIRED AND THE TECHNICIAN FOUND ANOTHER UPPER MOUNT THAT HAD CRACKS EVIDENT THIS WAS ALSO REPAIRED. ALL UPPER SHOCK MOUNTS WERE FOUND TO BE DIMPLED ON THE TOP SIDE. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE THICKNESS OF THE FRAME MATERIAL DID NOT SEEM TO BE THICK ENOUGH. HIS SUGGESTED REPAIR WOULD BE TO CUT OUT THAT SECTION OF FRAME AND INSTALL THICKER MATERIAL. *TR

Look up ODI 10510858 at NHTSA ↗

—00
Unknown Or Other00—0
Wheels000—

Co-reporting does not establish that one component caused another concern.

Recurring narrative patterns

Specific keyword mentions beyond broad component labels. Matching includes negations and comparisons and does not confirm a diagnosis.

1 patterns with matching reports.

Warning lights and dashboard alerts

1 mentions · 33.3% of complaints

Median mileage: 5,000 mi (1 usable records).

ODI 10575787 · 5,000 mi

TL THE CONTACT OWNS A 2011 DRV DOUBLETREE MOBILE SUITE DRV FIFTH WHEEL. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 70 MPH HE WAS NOTIFIED BY ANOTHER DRIVER THAT THE LANDING GEAR LOWERED AND THE GEAR HAD EXTENDED DOWN TO THE PAVEMENT. THE LANDING GEAR WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE HYDRAULIC LEVELING SYSTEM. THERE WERE NO WARNING LIGHTS WHEN THE FAILURE OCCURRED. THE FAILURE COULD HAVE POTENTIALLY CAUSED A MAJOR CRASH TO OCCUR. THE FAILURE WAS DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER WHO STATED THE HYDRAULIC SYSTEM CAUSED FLUID TO LEAK THROUGH AND LOWER THE LANDING GEAR…

Look up ODI 10575787 at NHTSA ↗

Matching rule\b(warning light\w*|check engine|dashboard warning\w*|malfunction indicator)\b