U.S. public vehicle records

Home And Park ROADTREK 200 problems and owner complaints

Explore the records behind recurring owner reports.

Key facts

2 owner complaints analyzed

2 distinct recall campaigns

25,725 mi median reported failure mileage

Scope: 1997 to 2000 model years. Data updated: 2026-10-01 (October 1, 2026). 2 complaints include usable failure mileage. View data status.

This selection has limited data. It remains available for lookup but is excluded from search indexing.

Owner-reported patterns

Most common problems

Tires:Tread/Belt is the most frequently named component, appearing in 1 of 2 complaints (50.0%). A complaint can name multiple components.

Component breakdown

Number of unique complaints naming each component. Top eight shown.

Tires:Tread/Belt

Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs

Tires:Tread/Belt: 1; Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs: 1

Reported problems by failure mileage

Complaint counts in mileage bands. These are not failure rates per vehicle or mile.

Under 25,000

25,000 to 49,999

50,000 to 74,999

75,000 to 99,999

100,000 to 149,999

150,000 and above

Under 25,000: 1; 25,000 to 49,999: 1; 50,000 to 74,999: 0; 75,000 to 99,999: 0; 100,000 to 149,999: 0; 150,000 and above: 0

Under 25,000 miles has the most reports with usable mileage (1). 0 complaints have missing, zero or invalid mileage.

Complaints over time

Year the complaint was filed, not the vehicle model year or incident year. The snapshot year is partial.

2003

2003: 2

Pattern summary

Tires:Tread/Belt leads the component reports. Use these patterns to inspect individual reports and prepare questions for a mechanic.

Calculated from recorded counts. An AI narrative has not been published for this selection.

Complaint evidence

Examples provide context, not a representative sample or a verified diagnosis.

Compare model years

Recalls by model year

All campaigns in the snapshot affecting each model year, including recalls announced years later.

From yearThrough year

Recall campaigns

Shared campaigns appear once in each affected model year.

1997

1998

1999

2000

1997: 1; 1998: 2; 1999: 2; 2000: 2

First model yearSecond model year

Year-by-year records

Home And Park ROADTREK 200 model-year comparison
Model year	Complaints	Recalls	Change in recalls
1997	0	1	Not available
1998	0	2	+1
1999	1	2	0
2000	1	2	0

Explore the data

Vehicle analysis explorer

Inspect model-year patterns, reported mileage, monthly activity and the evidence behind each signal.

Data completeness

2 unique complaints in this selection. Analysis snapshot: 2026-10-01.

100.0%Usable mileage2 / 2 records

100.0%Valid incident date2 / 2 records

100.0%Valid filing date2 / 2 records

100.0%Ordered incident and filing dates2 / 2 records

Missing, zero and invalid mileage is excluded. Dates after the snapshot are excluded. Examples are limited selections, not a representative sample.

Problems by model year

Model-wide comparison of the eight most reported components across the model. Cells show counts and shares within each model year. Open a cell for source examples.

From model yearThrough model year

Component complaint heatmap
Component	1997	1998	1999	2000
Tires:Tread/Belt	0Unavailable No examples available for this selection.	0Unavailable No examples available for this selection.	1100.0% ODI 10033208 · 23,450 mi BELT SEPARATION ON FIRESTONE STEELTEX LT245/75R-16 CAUSED SUDDEN ONSET OF HARD WOBBLE ON INTERSTATE HWY AT 65MPH. FIRESTONE MECHANIC SAYS BLOWOUT MAY HAVE BEEN IMMINENT. *AK Look up ODI 10033208 at NHTSA ↗	00.0% No examples available for this selection.
Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs	0Unavailable No examples available for this selection.	0Unavailable No examples available for this selection.	00.0% No examples available for this selection.	1100.0% ODI 10026831 · 28,000 mi SERIOUS DEFECT IN THE ALUMINUM WHEELS ON A ROADTREK MOTORHOME. *MR THE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT ALUMINUM WHEELS, BUT THE SALES DEALER TOLD THE CONSUMER THAT THE VEHICLE HAD COME EQUIPPED WITH STEEL WHEELS. THE CENTRAL HOLE OF THE AXLE IN THE ALUMINUM WHEEL WAS 1.5 MM LARGER THAN THE SIMILAR HOLE IN THE NEW STEEL WHEELS. THE NEW STEEL WHEELS FIT TIGHTLY ON THE AXLE. THEY CONCLUDED THAT THE WEIGHT WAS ENTIRELY ON THE STUDS AND CONSEQUENTLY THE STUDS WOULD BE PRESSURED TO BEND BACK AND FORTH WITH EVERY WHEEL REVOLUTION. THE RIGHT REAR HUB HAD A… Look up ODI 10026831 at NHTSA ↗

Darker cells indicate a larger share of submitted complaints. Components overlap. This measures complaint composition, not failure probability.

Failure mileage by component

Median and middle 50% of usable owner-reported mileages. Ranges require at least five records.

Component failure mileage distribution
Component	Mileage range (25th–75th percentile)	Median	Usable records	Examples
Tires:Tread/Belt	Too few reports for a range	23,450 mi	1 (sparse)	ODI 10033208 · 23,450 mi BELT SEPARATION ON FIRESTONE STEELTEX LT245/75R-16 CAUSED SUDDEN ONSET OF HARD WOBBLE ON INTERSTATE HWY AT 65MPH. FIRESTONE MECHANIC SAYS BLOWOUT MAY HAVE BEEN IMMINENT. *AK Look up ODI 10033208 at NHTSA ↗
Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs	Too few reports for a range	28,000 mi	1 (sparse)	ODI 10026831 · 28,000 mi SERIOUS DEFECT IN THE ALUMINUM WHEELS ON A ROADTREK MOTORHOME. *MR THE ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT ALUMINUM WHEELS, BUT THE SALES DEALER TOLD THE CONSUMER THAT THE VEHICLE HAD COME EQUIPPED WITH STEEL WHEELS. THE CENTRAL HOLE OF THE AXLE IN THE ALUMINUM WHEEL WAS 1.5 MM LARGER THAN THE SIMILAR HOLE IN THE NEW STEEL WHEELS. THE NEW STEEL WHEELS FIT TIGHTLY ON THE AXLE. THEY CONCLUDED THAT THE WEIGHT WAS ENTIRELY ON THE STUDS AND CONSEQUENTLY THE STUDS WOULD BE PRESSURED TO BEND BACK AND FORTH WITH EVERY WHEEL REVOLUTION. THE RIGHT REAR HUB HAD A… Look up ODI 10026831 at NHTSA ↗

Complaint and recall timeline

Explore monthly filing activity alongside recall announcements. Up to ten years of monthly history is available.

ComponentPeriod

Solid line: filed complaints. Dashed amber lines: recall announcement dates for this vehicle selection; markers include all recall components. The latest month is partial. Temporal proximity does not establish causation.

Monthly counts, recall campaigns and complaint examples

Monthly complaint and recall timeline
Month	Campaigns announced	Examples
2024-11	None	No examples available for this selection.
2024-12	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-01	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-02	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-03	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-04	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-05	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-06	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-07	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-08	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-09	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-10	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-11	None	No examples available for this selection.
2025-12	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-01	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-02	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-03	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-04	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-05	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-06	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-07	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-08	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-09	None	No examples available for this selection.
2026-10 (partial)	None	No examples available for this selection.

Emerging complaint spikes

Complete months in the latest six months with at least 10 complaints, at least twice the preceding 12-month average, and at least three square-root deviations above that average.

This is a descriptive screening rule, not a statistical defect finding. Publicity and reporting changes can increase submissions.

No complete months meet the spike thresholds for this selection.

Equal-age model-year comparison

Model-wide cumulative reports during the first three or five calendar years, starting with the model year (age 0). Only fully elapsed windows are compared.

Observation windowFirst model yearSecond model year

1999: 0 complaints · 2000: 0 complaints

Equal observation windows
Model year	Through age 0	Through age 1	Through age 2
1999	0	0	0
2000	0	0	0

Date coverage across each selected cohort

Date basis for all complaints in selected model years
Year	Incident dates used	Filing date fallbacks	Excluded dates
1999	1	0	0
2000	1	0	0

Incident date is preferred when valid and no later than filing; otherwise filing date is used. Model year approximates age. Equal observation time does not adjust for sales, distance driven or reporting delays. One complaint linked to multiple model years can appear in each cohort.

Components reported together

Each cell counts unique complaints naming both components. Open a nonzero cell for examples.

Component co-occurrence matrix
Component	Tires:Tread/Belt	Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs
Tires:Tread/Belt	—	0
Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs	0	—

Co-reporting does not establish that one component caused another concern.

Recurring narrative patterns

Specific keyword mentions beyond broad component labels. Matching includes negations and comparisons and does not confirm a diagnosis.

Search patterns

0 patterns with matching reports.

No narratives match the published patterns.

Component breakdown data
Category	Count
Tires:Tread/Belt	1
Wheels:Lugs/Nuts/Bolts/Studs	1